CHRISTOPHER JASON FLETCHER
v.
AYANA MCCULLOCH
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Christopher Jason Fletcher appeals a circuit court order adopting a general magistrate's report in a paternity action. The court ratified the magistrate's report without holding a hearing on Fletcher's timely exceptions. The appellate court reversed and remanded, finding the trial court erred by summarily denying exceptions without the required hearing.
The trial court erred by ratifying the magistrate's report without holding a hearing on Fletcher's timely exceptions. Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.490(f) requires that exceptions to a magistrate's report must be heard on reasonable notice when filed. The absence of a hearing transcript at the time of the original exceptions filing does not justify denying the exceptions without a hearing.
[1] When a party timely files exceptions to a magistrate's report under Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure section 12.490(f), the court must hold a hearing on those except…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“If exceptions are filed, they must be heard on reasonable notice by either party or the court.”
The court cited Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.490(f) to establish the mandatory requirement for a hearing on exceptions.
Fletcher timely filed exceptions to a magistrate's report in a paternity case within ten days of service, arguing the report lacked competent substant…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Transcript Of Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Susan Alspector, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE20-003886.
Carlton Pierce of Carlton Pierce, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant. No appearance for appellee. KUNTZ, J.
Christopher Jason Fletcher appeals the circuit court’s order ratifying and approving the general magistrate’s report in a paternity action. Fletcher argues the court erred when it adopted the general magistrate’s report without holding a hearing on his exceptions to the report. We agree.
When a magistrate serves a report and recommendation, “[t]he parties may file exceptions to the report within 10 days from the time it is served on them . . . . If exceptions are filed, they must be heard on reasonable notice by either party or the court.” Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.490(f).
Less than ten days after the magistrate served the report and recommendation on Fletcher, but not on his counsel, Fletcher’s counsel filed exceptions to the magistrate’s report. Fletcher argued that the report was not supported by competent substantial evidence and that the child support calculations did not match the oral pronouncement. He also requested more time to file a transcript of the hearing held by the magistrate.
Two days later, Fletcher filed amended exceptions to the magistrate’s report including citations to the hearing transcript. Fletcher also filed the hearing transcript. Later that day, an order ratifying the magistrate’s report was rendered and served on Fletcher. Like the magistrate’s report, the certificate of service suggests the court’s order was served on Fletcher and not his counsel.
Fletcher’s original exceptions to the magistrate’s report were timely filed. Rule 12.490(f) requires a party filing exceptions to a magistrate’s report do so within ten days. When a party files exceptions, they must be heard on reasonable notice by either party or the court. Finally, a transcript of the relevant proceedings must be provided to the judge forty-eight hours before that hearing. Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.490(g)(2).
The court did not explain the basis for denying the exceptions and adopting the magistrate’s report. But the absence of the transcript at the time of filing the original exceptions is not a proper basis to deny the exceptions. Murison v. Coral Park Props., Inc., 64 So. 3d 1288, 1289-90 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Nor is the failure to file a transcript within a sixty-day time frame imposed by a local administrative order. Langsetmo v. Metza, 306 So. 3d 112, 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).
Fletcher timely filed exceptions to the magistrate’s report, and the court erred when it summarily denied the exceptions without holding a hearing. We reverse the court’s order adopting the magistrate’s report and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded. MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Arne Langsetmo v. Metza, 306 So. 3d 112 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020)
- Murison v. Coral Park Props., Inc., 64 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)