JESSICA RAFFERTY A/N/G NOAH HENDERSHOT
v.
MARTIN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.

Fla. 4th DCA | 2022-03-23
No. 21-0368
Warner, J., Gross, J., Artau, J., Bronis, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2022)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The court affirmed dismissal of a medical negligence complaint against a hospital and nursing staff for failure to submit corroborating expert statements addressing their alleged deficiencies, even though corroboration was adequate as to the midwife.


Holding

A plaintiff's corroborating expert statements must specifically address the alleged deficiencies in care by each defendant; statements supporting a claim against a midwife do not satisfy the corroboration requirement for a hospital and nursing staff.


Headnotes

[1] Corroborating expert statements required by section 766.203(2), Florida Statutes, must specifically address the alleged deficiencies in care attributable to each defendan…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Because the affidavit is plainly insufficient as a statement to corroborate reasonable grounds to support a claim of medical malpractice as to the nurses and supervisors, the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in denying [the hospital's] motion to dismiss.”

Court citing University of South Florida Board of Trustees v. Mann for the principle that corroborating affidavits must specifically address each defendant's alleged deficiencies.

Facts & Procedural History

A baby suffered a shoulder dystocia injury during delivery. The plaintiff sued the midwife, hospital, and nursing staff for medical negligence.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Marc J. Schleier and James D. DeChurch of Fowler White Burnett, P.A., Miami, for appellee Martin Memorial Medical Center, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order granting a motion to dismiss a medical negligence complaint for failure to comply with the corroboration requirements of section 766.203(2), Florida Statutes (2018). The plaintiff below sued a midwife and the hospital staff for medical negligence during the delivery of a baby, who suffered a shoulder dystocia injury. The trial court granted the motion to dismiss as it applied to the hospital and the nursing staff.

While the corroborating statements the plaintiff submitted with the notice of intent identified reasonable grounds to initiate medical malpractice litigation against the midwife who delivered the baby, nothing in the statements addressed any deficiencies in the care provided by the hospital and its nursing staff. Thus, dismissal is required pursuant to the plain text of section 766.206(2), Florida Statutes (2018). See Univ. of S. Fla. Bd. of Trs. v. Mann, 159 So. 3d 283, 284 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (“Because the affidavit is plainly insufficient as a statement to corroborate reasonable grounds to support a claim of medical malpractice as to the nurses and supervisors, the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in denying [the hospital’s] motion to dismiss . . . .”); Duffy v. Brooker, 614 So. 2d 539, 545–46 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (interpreting “sections 766.203(2) and 766.203(3) to require that the ‘corroboration’ statements outline the factual basis for the medical experts’ opinions” and rejecting as insufficient “conclusory allegations” that did not “sufficiently indicate the manner in which the [medical provider] allegedly deviated from the standard of care”), abrogated on other grounds as recognized in Archer v. Maddux, 645 So. 2d 544, 547 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and ARTAU, JJ., concur. . * * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

2


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw