ALLIANCE JJ MIAMI, LLC
v.
JOSIAH COATES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Alliance JJ Miami, LLC appealed a small claims judgment in favor of Josiah Coates regarding a $350 early cancellation fee charged under a martial arts membership agreement. The court affirmed the lower tribunal's finding that the fee was unauthorized, holding that the contract contained no early cancellation fee provision and that the parties had rescinded the original term in favor of a month-to-month arrangement.
The court affirmed the judgment in favor of Coates, holding that the contract contained no early cancellation fee provision and that the trial court's finding that the parties rescinded the original term in favor of a month-to-month option was supported by competent, substantial evidence, rendering the fee assessment unauthorized.
[1] When a contract is ambiguous or lacks an express provision, a party cannot unilaterally impose fees or obligations not clearly stated in the agreement.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Declining to engraft an additional obligation into the contract”
Court's rejection of imposing an unauthorized early cancellation fee not found in the agreement's terms
Coates was charged a $350 early cancellation fee by Alliance JJ Miami under a martial arts membership agreement. The contract's language permitted a $…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rescission Of Contract cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion filed June 29, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________ No. 3D21-1766 Lower Tribunal No. 20-13216 SP ________________
Alliance JJ Miami, LLC,
Appellant,
vs.
Josiah Coates,
Appellee.
An appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Gisela Cardonne Ely, Senior Judge. Ainsworth + Clancy, PLLC, and Yamila Lorenzo, and Ryan M. Clancy, for appellant. Josiah Coates, in proper person. Before LOGUE, MILLER, and GORDO, JJ. MILLER, J.
Appellant, Alliance JJ Miami, LLC, challenges a final judgment entered in favor of appellee, Josiah Coates, in the underlying small claims action. As relevant to this appeal, the underlying dispute concerned whether Coates was entitled to reimbursement of a $350 “early cancellation fee” assessed purportedly pursuant to a martial arts membership agreement. Following a bench trial, the lower tribunal determined that the fee was unauthorized under the circumstances. Our de novo review of the contract yields the identical conclusion. See D & E Real Est., LLC v. Vitto, 260 So. 3d 429, 433 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“The interpretation of a contract is a question of law which is . . . subject to de novo review.”). The agreement contains no early cancellation fee provision. Instead, it only allows for the imposition of a $350 fee “[i]f the payment responsibilities stipulated in this contract are not fulfilled.” Declining to engraft an additional obligation into the contract and further finding that the conclusion by the trial court that the parties rescinded the original term of the contract in favor of a month-to-month option, rendering Coates compliant with payment obligations, is amply supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm in all respects. See Fed. Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n v. Morton, 196 So. 3d 428, 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (“[W]hether a party has substantially complied with or performed a contract term remains a question of fact.”).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Morton, 196 So. 3d 428 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
- D & E Real Est. v. Vitto, 260 So. 3d 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)