ANDREW J. PEREZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court affirmed a conviction for receiving and concealing stolen property, holding that a judgment entered on a guilty plea generally cannot be reviewed on appeal. The defendant appealed his conviction, which followed a guilty plea, but the court found no basis to disturb the adjudication.
No, a judgment entered on a guilty plea generally cannot be reviewed by appeal, and the record in this case provided no basis for an exception to this rule.
“A judgment entered on a plea of guilty ordinarily can not be reviewed by appeal.”
Establishes the general rule regarding the appellate reviewability of guilty pleas.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAndrew J. Perez pleaded guilty to receiving and concealing stolen property. Following this plea, he was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to a term of …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Receiving Stolen Property cases and more on FLexlaw
Appellant was informed against separately for receiving and concealing stolen property and for the crime against nature. Upon his pleading guilty to the former offense he was not prosecuted on the latter. There followed an adjudication of guilt of the crime of Receiving and Concealing Stolen Property, and a sentence of confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of not less than six months and not more than five years. The defendant has appealed in propria persona from the judgment. We have fully examined the record, and the extensive brief which the appellant personally prepared and filed, and conclude that no showing has been made upon which this appellate court could or should disturb the adjudication of guilt of the offense of receiving and concealing stolen property *866which was entered pursuant to the defendant’s plea of guilty to that offense. A judgment entered on a plea of guilty ordinarily can not be reviewed by appeal. State ex rel. Baggs v. Frederick, 124 Fla. 290, 168 So. 252, 253. The record in this case affords no basis to make exception to that rule.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gibson v. State, 173 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)…. 668, citing Mixon v. State, Fla.1951, 54 So. 2d 190; and further, that a judgment entered on a plea of guilty ordinarily cannot be reviewed by appeal. State ex rel. Baggs v. Frederick, 1936, 124 Fla. 290, 168 So. 252; Perez v. State, Fla.App.1963, 151 So. 2d 865. Accordingly, the second allegation of the petitioner is conclusively refuted by record and the trial court was entitled to summarily reject it. Appellant’s final allegation is that he was denied a preliminary hearing. It has been continually hel…
-
Williams v. State, 174 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)…under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1. Therefore, the action of the trial court is hereby affirmed upon the following authorities: Mixon v. State, Fla.1951, 54 So. 2d 190; Morgan v. State, Fla.App.1962, 142 So. 2d 308; Perez v. State, Fla.App. 1963, 151 So. 2d 865; Ingrim v. State, Fla.App.1964, 166 So. 2d 805; Sardinia v. State, Fla.1964, 168 So. 2d 674, 675. Affirmed.…
-
Bryant v. State, 168 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See: Perez v. State, Fla.App. 1963, 151 So. 2d 865.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Frederick, 124 Fla. 290 (Fla. 1936)
- Perez v. State, 143 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)