EMIL MORTON D/B/A MORTON TOWERS COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
LEO GELVAN AND YETTA GELVAN, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
EMIL MORTON D/B/A MORTON TOWERS COMPANY, APPELLANT,
LEO GELVAN AND YETTA GELVAN, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
151 So. 2d 866
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Defendant, counterplaintiff, appeals a final judgment for plaintiff entered after a non-jury trial. He bases his appeal on (1) the refusal of the trial judge to admit a certain letter into evidence, and (2) alleged prejudicial remarks by appellees’ trial counsel.
The refusal to admit the letter proffered is sustained upon authority of Green v. Hood, Fla.App. 1960, 120 So.2d 223, 227. The alleged prejudicial remarks, having been made during a non-jury trial, are not of sufficient weight to require reversal.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shirlee KAY and her husband v. Rests., Inc., 168 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)…[*164] PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Schatz v. 7-Eleven, Inc., Fla.App.1961, 128 So. 2d 901; Lipnick v. Sabal Palm Apartments, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 151 So. 2d 866.…
Authorities Cited
- Green v. Hood, 120 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)