FERNANDO GONZALEZ-MARHAM
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An order denying a motion to correct, reduce, or modify a sentence is not appealable.
[1] An order denying a motion to correct, reduce, or modify a sentence is not appealable.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGonzalez-Marham was sentenced to five years in prison for trafficking in cocaine. Approximately fifteen months after sentencing, he filed an emergency…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appealability Of Orders cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Fernando Gonzalez-Marham, challenges a post-decretal order denying his emergency petition for furlough and home confinement. The motion, filed approximately fifteen months after appellant was sentenced to five years in prison for trafficking in cocaine, cites concerns over COVID- 19. As an order denying a motion to correct, reduce, or modify a sentence is not appealable, we dismiss the appeal. Adams v. State, 487 So. 2d 1209, 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Baker v. State, 746 So. 2d 469, 469 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Hernandez v. State, 62 So. 3d 1158, 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1).
Dismissed.
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Adams v. State, 487 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
- Baker v. State, 746 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
- Hernandez v. State, 62 So. 3d 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)