MICHAEL BOYINGTON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petition for writ of mandamus is moot when the trial court has already rendered a ruling on the pleading that was the subject of the mandamus petition.
[1] A petition for writ of mandamus becomes moot when the trial court has already ruled on the pleading that is the subject of the mandamus petition.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBoyington sought a writ of mandamus in the appellate court. The trial court had already ruled on the pleading that was the basis for the mandamus peti…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Writ Of Mandamus cases and more on FLexlaw
September 28, 2022 PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court has ruled on the pleading pending below, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State, 770 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (dismissing a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below).
LEWIS, MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Michael Boyington, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.