AVISUS SEDALE DAVIS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se litigant whose repeated postconviction filings in a criminal case are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous may be sanctioned with a bar on future pro se filing and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings.
[1] A court may sanction a pro se litigant by barring future pro se filings and referring the litigant to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings when the litigant's re…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Because it appears that Appellant's postconviction filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further similarly inappropriate pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from Marion County Circuit Court Case Number 2017-CF-2047 may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time.”
Court's cautionary order to appellant regarding future filings
Avisus Sedale Davis filed postconviction relief motions in a criminal case (Marion County Circuit Court Case No. 2017-CF-2047). The circuit court deni…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
This Court previously affirmed the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief in Marion County Circuit Court Case Number
2017-CF-2047. Because it appears that Appellant’s postconviction filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further similarly inappropriate pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from Marion County Circuit Court Case Number 2017-CF-2047 may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2020); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d
APPELLANT CAUTIONED.
EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.