RONALD CURRY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Repeated pro se appeals raising the same already-adjudicated sentencing claim constitute frivolous litigation and an abuse of court process, subjecting the appellant to potential Spencer sanctions.
[1] A party's repeated filing of pro se appeals raising the same claim of error previously considered on the merits and reviewed on multiple occasions constitutes frivolous l…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The continuous attempts by this appellant to revisit this issue are frivolous and an abuse of this court's process.”
Court's rationale for imposing warning
Ronald Curry has filed multiple appeals raising the same claim of error regarding his sentence in criminal case 2010-CF-009187-D-O, which has been con…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Ronald Curry, continues to raise the same claim of error, which has been considered on the merits, disposed of by the trial court, and reviewed in this court on multiple occasions. The continuous attempts
2
by this appellant to revisit this issue are frivolous and an abuse of this court's process.
As such, the appellant is cautioned that any further pro se pleadings filed in this court asserting the claim raised in this case and regarding the sentence imposed in Orange County Circuit Case No. 2010-CF-009187-D-O may result in Spencer sanctions being imposed. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
APPELLANT WARNED.
COHEN, SASSO and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.