SARAH LEDFORD, PETITIONER,
v.
SEARS ROEBUCK & CO., LALLY ADJUSTMENT BUREAU AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1963-04-24
No. 32475
ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS and THORNAL, JJ., concur., DREW, J., concurs specially.
152 So. 2d 471 Florida Supreme Court (1963) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on Petition for Writ of Certiorari upon the transcript of record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, to review the order of the Florida Industrial Commission in said cause, bearing date December 28, 1962, and the Petitioner having failed to show that the essential requirements of law have been violated, it is ordered that said Petition be and the same is hereby denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

DREW, J., concurs specially.

DREW, Justice

(concurring specially).

I concur in the denial of certiorari in this case solely because of Petitioner’s failure to complain, either here or before the full commission, of the palpable insufficiency of Deputy Halpert’s compensation order based on a record containing 180 pages of involved evidence. The questioned order contains nothing but the Deputy’s ultimate findings and judgment.

Concurrence
DREW, Justice

DREW, Justice

(concurring specially).

I concur in the denial of certiorari in this case solely because of Petitioner’s failure to complain, either here or before the full commission, of the palpable insufficiency of Deputy Halpert’s compensation order based on a record containing 180 pages of involved evidence. The questioned order contains nothing but the Deputy’s ultimate findings and judgment.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Callendar v. State, 181 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 1966)
    …y to entertain an appeal from an order of a district court unless such order either passed upon the validity of a statute or construed a constitutional provision. Evans v. Carroll, Fla.1958, 104 So. 2d 375; State ex rel. Emanuel v. Cooper, Fla.1963, 152 So. 2d 471. It is obvious that the district court of appeal’s simple per curiam orders denying certiorari from which the subject appeals were taken to this Court neither directly passed on the validity of a statute nor construed a provision of either state or…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw