T.T., A CHILD
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Brief cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Blake D. Mixon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F. 3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Mixon has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with eoun-sel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- F.F. v. State, 218 So. 3d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)