DONALD KAUTZ
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petitioner filing repetitive and frivolous habeas corpus petitions may be subject to sanctions including restrictions on pro se filings and disciplinary referrals.
[1] A court of appeal may bar pro se filings and refer an incarcerated petitioner to prison authorities for disciplinary proceedings, including forfeiture of gain time, when…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDonald Kautz, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the District Court of Appeal stemming from a 2009 criminal case (Case N…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
This Court earlier dismissed Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus stemming from Brevard County Circuit Court Case Number 2009-CF-48339-X. Because it appears that Petitioner’s filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from Brevard County Circuit Court Case No. 2009-CF-48339-X may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999). PETITIONER CAUTIONED.
LAMBERT, C.J., WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.