ARTHUR AVERY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the trial court's order denying postconviction relief and warned the appellant that future abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings may result in sanctions.
[1] A court may caution a pro se appellant that further abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings in postconviction litigation may result in sanctions including a…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceArthur Avery, proceeding pro se, appealed the trial court's order denying his motion for postconviction relief in a criminal case. The court had previ…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Abusive Litigation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This court previously affirmed the trial court’s order(s) denying Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief in Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2012-CF-8523. Because it appears that Appellant’s postconviction filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this court asserting claims stemming from Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2012-CF-8523 may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filings in this court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999).
APPELLANT CAUTIONED.
SASSO, TRAVER and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.