TIMOTHY EDISON BRADLEY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
When a party makes abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous postconviction filings, the appellate court may warn of sanctions including a bar on pro se filing and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings.
[1] An appellate court may warn a pro se litigant of potential sanctions, including a bar on further pro se filings and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedi…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTimothy Edison Bradley appealed from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief in a criminal case. Bradley's postconviction filings in the ap…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
This Court previously affirmed the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief in Lake County Circuit Court Case Number 2009-CF-002880-A. Because it appears that Appellant’s postconviction filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further similarly inappropriate pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from Lake County Circuit Court Case Number 2009-CF-002880-A may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2020); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999). APPELLANT CAUTIONED.
WALLIS, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.