RUFUS C. LEEDY, ET UX.,
v.
WILLIAM L. O'CONNELL, AS RECEIVER OF MOLINE STATE TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, AN INSOLVENT BANKING CORPORATION, OF MOLINE, ILLINOIS
RUFUS C. LEEDY, ET UX.,
WILLIAM L. O'CONNELL, AS RECEIVER OF MOLINE STATE TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, AN INSOLVENT BANKING CORPORATION, OF MOLINE, ILLINOIS
119 Fla. 313
Florida Supreme Court (1935)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 161 So. 385
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Reliance Fertilizer Co. v. Davis, 124 Fla. 859 (Fla. 1936)…this writ of error.” It, therefore, appears that if there is any error in the judgment, plaintiff in error, through its attorneys, invited the error and, therefore, can take no advantage of it. In the case of Reliance Fertilizer Company v. Davis, 119 Fla. 313, 161 Sou. 385, we had under consideration judgment in favor of defendant entered upon demurrer to the pleas being overruled. We held that the demurrers to the pleas should have been sustained. After the mandate went down the case was tried on an ame…