JAMES STRAWDER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A successive habeas corpus petition may be denied and the petitioner warned of potential sanctions for abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings.
[1] A court may sanction a pro se litigant by warning of potential bar on future pro se filings and referral to prison disciplinary proceedings when the litigant's successive…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJames Strawder, proceeding pro se, filed a successive petition for writ of habeas corpus in a case from 2015. The trial court denied the petition.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Abusive Litigation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This Court previously affirmed the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s successive petition for writ of habeas corpus in Marion County Circuit Court Case No. 2015-CF-527-A-Z. Because it appears that Appellant’s postconviction filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further similarly inappropriate pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from Marion County Circuit Court Case No. 2015-CF-527-A-Z, may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filings in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2022); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
APPELLANT CAUTIONED.
MAKAR, JAY and SOUD, JJ., concur.