CHRISTOPHER SOLS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2023-03-22
No. 22-2105
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court is not required to order an updated presentence investigation report under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.710(a) before resentencing a defendant whose original conviction was otherwise upheld.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court is not required to order an updated presentence investigation report under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.710(a) when resentencing a defendant whose o…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“a trial court may, but is not required to under the rule or statute, order an updated PSI”

Court's citation to Lee v. State establishing that updated PSI is discretionary, not mandatory

Facts & Procedural History

Christopher Sols was convicted of second-degree murder with a firearm and received a life sentence. This Court had previously affirmed his conviction …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

DAMOORGIAN, J.

Christopher Sols appeals his life sentence for second-degree murder with a firearm, which was imposed after this Court affirmed his conviction and remanded for a new sentencing hearing in Sols v. State, 310 So. 3d 422 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021). Appellant’s only argument on appeal is that the trial court erred by failing to obtain and consider an updated presentence investigation report (“PSI”) before resentencing him to life in prison. Notably, Appellant does not dispute that the trial court considered his original 2019 PSI during the resentencing proceedings.

Because a trial court is not required to order an updated PSI under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.710(a) before resentencing a defendant whose original conviction was otherwise upheld, we affirm. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(a) (“No sentence or sentences other than probation or the statutorily required mandatory minimum may be imposed on any defendant found guilty of a first felony offense or found guilty of a felony while under the age of 18 years, until after such investigation has first been made and the recommendations of the Department of Corrections received and considered by the sentencing judge.”); Lee v. State, 234 So. 3d 562, 564 (Fla. 2018) (citing rule 3.710(a) and holding that a “trial court may, but is not required to under the rule or statute, order an updated PSI”).

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., and ARTAU, J., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

2


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw