LISA MIJARES
v.
JUAN CARLOS ECHEVERRIA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellant must present a complete record including witness testimony and evidentiary rulings to overcome the presumption of correctness of trial court findings; absent such a record, a judgment that is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed.
[1] An appellant bears the burden of presenting a complete appellate record, including witness testimony and evidentiary rulings, to overcome the presumption of correctness a…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“An appellant has the burden to present a record that will overcome the presumption of correctness of the trial court's findings. Where there is no record of the testimony of witnesses or evidentiary rulings, and where a statement of the record has not been prepared... a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed.”
Court's explanation of the standard for appellate review and the consequences of an inadequate record
This is an appeal from a circuit court judgment in Miami-Dade County. The appellants challenged the trial court's decision but failed to provide an ad…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fundamental Error cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co., 81 So. 3d 556, 557–58 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“An appellant has the burden to present a record that will overcome the presumption of correctness of the trial court’s findings. . . . Where there is no record of the testimony of witnesses or evidentiary rulings, and where a statement of the record has not been prepared. . . a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed.”); see also Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (affirming where “the record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co., 81 So. 3d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)