GARY L. WHITE, JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petition for writ of quo warranto that merely reiterates claims from a prior petition for writ of prohibition must be denied with prejudice.
[1] Repetitive filing of substantially similar petitions for extraordinary writ relief constitutes grounds for denial with prejudice and may subject a pro se litigant to sanc…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGary L. White, Jr., a pro se litigant, filed a petition for writ of quo warranto. He had previously filed a writ of prohibition petition raising the s…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
WALLIS, J.
Gary L. White, Jr., petitions this court for a writ of quo warranto. Because he reiterates the same claims he raised in a prior petition for writ of prohibition, we deny the petition with prejudice and caution him that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings directed to Marion County Circuit Court Case Numbers 2020-CF-5068, 2021-CF-442, 2021-CF-1091, 2020-CF-5069, 2020-CF-5067 may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2020); Topps v. State, 865 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 2004); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
PETITION DENIED, WITH PREJUDICE; APPELLANT CAUTIONED. MAKAR and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Topps v. State, 865 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 2004)