DAPHNE CAMPBELL
v.
NACIVRE CHARLES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An offer of judgment made at a time when it is directed to a future, unscheduled trial period rather than the current trial period is timely and not a nullity.
[1] An offer of judgment is valid and timely when made at a time directed to a future, unscheduled trial period rather than the current trial period.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“If an Offer of Judgment is made at a point in time in which it appears, from the facts of the individual case, that the Offer of Judgment is not directed to the current trial period, but, rather, is intended for the next, as yet, unscheduled trial period, then in that situation, and in that situation only, the Offer of Judgment is not a nullity and is considered timely.”
Court's citation to Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Radiology & Imaging Center of South Florida, Inc., 761 So. 2d 399, 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
Daphne Campbell appealed a decision in a case against Nacivre Charles in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Radiology & Imaging Ctr.
of S. Fla., Inc., 761 So. 2d 399, 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“If an Offer of
Judgment is made at a point in time in which it appears, from the facts of the individual case, that the Offer of Judgment is not directed to the current trial period, but, rather, is intended for the next, as yet, unscheduled trial period,
then in that situation, and in that situation only, the Offer of Judgment is not a nullity and is considered timely.”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Radiology & Imaging Ctr. of S. Fla., Inc., 761 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)