JENE VELASCO
v.
DONALD C. SOLLEY, III

Fla. 4th DCA | 2023-04-05
No. 22-2494
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Child support calculations must be based on each parent's net monthly income, not gross income, and failure to subtract allowable statutory deductions from gross income is reversible error.


Headnotes

[1] Child support guidelines require the calculation of net monthly income for each parent by subtracting statutory deductions from gross income.

[2] It is reversible error to calculate child support using gross income rather than net income.

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“It is reversable error to calculate child support using gross income, as opposed to net income.”

Court citing McKenzie v. McKenzie, 254 So. 3d 993, 995 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)

Facts & Procedural History

In a paternity case, the trial court issued a temporary child support order that failed to deduct allowable deductions from the mother's gross monthly…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Jene Velasco, the mother in a paternity case, appeals a nonfinal order on temporary child support, timesharing, and legal fees. We reverse and remand the portion of the order awarding child support to Donald Solley, the father, because the trial court mathematically erred in calculating support. We affirm on all other issues without comment.

The child support guidelines are the starting point for determining temporary support, just as they are for final support orders. Elias v. Elias, 168 So. 3d 301, 301 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (citations omitted).

The guidelines first require the trial court to calculate the parties’ gross monthly incomes. § 61.30(2), Fla. Stat. (2022). Net monthly income for each parent is then determined by subtracting statutory deductions from gross income. § 61.30(3)-(4), Fla. Stat. (2022). After arriving at a combined net monthly income, and applying that figure to the guidelines schedule, the trial court determines each parent’s percentage share of the child

2

support need “by dividing each parent’s net monthly income by the combined net monthly income.” § 61.30(9), Fla. Stat. (2022).

Here, the support guidelines worksheet attached to the trial court’s temporary relief order fails to subtract allowable deductions from the mother’s gross monthly income. It is reversable error to calculate child support using gross income, as opposed to net income. McKenzie v. McKenzie, 254 So. 3d 993, 995 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). The father concedes error on this issue.

We therefore reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to determine temporary child support based on the parties’ net incomes.

Reversed and remanded with instructions. KLINGENSMITH, C.J., MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw