LARRY L. BLAND
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 3d DCA | 2023-04-19
No. 23-0119
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A circuit court lacks jurisdiction to consider a petition for writ of habeas corpus that collaterally attacks a judgment and sentence imposed in a different judicial circuit.


Headnotes

[1] A circuit court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging a conviction and sentence imposed by a court in a different judicial circ…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Larry L. Bland filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit (Miami-Dade County), alleging he was being held illegally d…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Opinion filed April 19, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-119 Lower Tribunal No. F22-21141

________________

Larry L. Bland,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, Judge. Larry L. Bland, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Larry L. Bland appeals the trial court's order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Bland alleges that he is being held illegally due to an infirmity in the judgment and sentence entered by the trial court after a conviction in the First Judicial Circuit. The trial court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit does not have jurisdiction to consider and determine a petition for a writ of habeas corpus that collaterally attacks the judgment and sentence imposed in the First Judicial Circuit. See Broom v. State, 907 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). We therefore reverse and remand with instructions to transfer Bland's petition to the First Judicial Circuit. See Peoples v. State, 260 So. 3d 365 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Reversed and remanded with instructions.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw