BLAKE LEE MARCH
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2023-04-19
No. 21-2718
Weiss, J., Kuntz, J., May, J., Ciklin, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A defendant convicted of burglary of a dwelling with assault or battery is eligible for sentencing under the prison release reoffender statute because burglary of a dwelling is an enumerated crime and the assault or battery variant is a greater degree of that included crime.


Headnotes

[1] A defendant convicted of a greater degree of an enumerated crime under the prison release reoffender statute is eligible for sentencing under that statute, even if the sp…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“giving [the PRR and burglary statutes] their plain meaning, reveals that burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery is punishable by a life sentence under the PRR statute.”

Court's reliance on First District precedent in Campbell v. State to support its interpretation of the statute

Facts & Procedural History

Blake Lee March was convicted of burglary of a dwelling with assault or battery. He appealed, arguing that because this specific crime variant was not…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

KUNTZ, J.

Blake Lee March appeals his conviction and sentence. We briefly write to address his argument that because “burglary with an assault or battery” is not an enumerated crime in the prison release reoffender statute, section 775.082(9)(a)1., Florida Statutes (2021), he could not be sentenced under the PRR statute. We disagree.

The PRR statute states that “‘prison release reoffender’ means any defendant who commits, or attempts to commit: . . . q. Burglary of a dwelling or burglary of an occupied structure[.]” § 775.082(9)(a)1., Fla. Stat. (2021). March was convicted of burglary of a dwelling with assault or battery, a greater degree of the included crime. We agree with the First District’s opinion in Campbell v. State, 29 So. 3d 1147, 1149 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“giving [the PRR and burglary statutes] their plain meaning, reveals that burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery is punishable by a life sentence under the PRR statute.”). 1

As a result, we conclude March was eligible to be sentenced under the PRR statute and affirm his conviction and sentence.

Affirmed.

MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

1The First District also concluded that “[i]t would be illogical to construe the PRR statute in a way that allows an enhanced sentence for simple burglary of a dwelling, but not for a greater degree of that same crime.” Campbell, 29 So. 3d at 1149-50.

2


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw