BARRY KILCOYNE
v.
JOSEPH P. GEORGE, JR.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The circuit court, not the county court, has exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over disputes concerning probate attorney fees arising from estate administration.
[1] The circuit court has exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over proceedings relating to the settlement of decedents' estates, including disputes concerning probate attor…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the Florida probate court has exclusive jurisdiction [over matters relating to probate attorney's compensation] and is obligated to review estate fees upon the petition of a proper party”
Court cited Faulkner v. Woodruff, 159 So. 3d 319, 322 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
Barry Kilcoyne, as personal representative of Ralph Muir's estate, appealed a county court order awarding attorney's fees to Joseph P. George, Jr. for…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
HENDON, J.
Barry Kilcoyne, personal representative of the estate of Ralph Muir, seeks to reverse a final order of the County Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in Miami-Dade County in favor of Joseph P. George, Jr.’s claim for attorney’s fees arising out of the administration of the estate. We reverse. Because the circuit court has exclusive jurisdiction over proceedings relating to the settlement of the estates of decedents, including proceedings to determine a probate lawyer’s compensation, we conclude that the county court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to determine this fee dispute. § 26.012(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2023); § 733.6175, Fla. Stat. (2023); § 733.106(4), Fla. Stat. (2023); see also In re Est. of Udell, 501 So. 2d 1286, 1288 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Faulkner v. Woodruff, 159 So. 3d 319, 322 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (holding that “the Florida probate court has exclusive jurisdiction [over matters relating to probate attorney’s compensation] and is obligated to review estate fees upon the petition of a proper party”) (citing In re Winston, 610 So. 2d 1323, 1325 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)).
Accordingly, we reverse the order on appeal, and remand the cause with instructions to transfer the case to the circuit court for further proceedings. Due to the disposition of the jurisdictional issue, we decline to reach the merits of the issues on appeal. 2 Reversed and remanded.
3
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Jones v. State, 501 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
- In re Est. OF Edna Vivian Winston v. Winston, 610 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
- Faulkner v. Kirsten Woodruff, 159 So. 3d 319 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)