GREGORY POLAND
v.
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appeal of a trial court's order of dismissal is untimely and a trial court does not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to vacate when procedural requirements are not satisfied.
[1] An appeal of a trial court's order of dismissal must comply with applicable time requirements under the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure or the appeal will be dismiss…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGregory Poland appealed a trial court's order of dismissal and the court's denial of his motion to vacate in an insurance dispute against Citizens Pro…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Timeliness Of Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion filed May 31, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-679 Lower Tribunal No. 19-404-P
________________
Gregory Poland,
Appellant,
vs.
Citizens Property Insurance Corporation,
Appellee.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Timothy J. Koenig, Judge. Schwartz Sladkus Reich Greenberg Atlas LLP, and Robin Bresky, and Jessica L. Underwood, and Jonathan Mann (Boca Raton), for appellant. Williams, Leininger & Cosby, P.A., and Carri S. Leininger, and Maureen Martinez (North Palm Beach), for appellee. Before LINDSEY, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Gregory Poland, appeals the trial court’s order of dismissal
and its order denying appellant’s motion to vacate. Finding appellant’s
appeal of the trial court’s order of dismissal untimely and no abuse of
discretion in the denial of appellant’s motion to vacate, we dismiss in part
and affirm in part. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b); Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(h)(1);
Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.
1979).
Dismissed in part and affirmed in part.