DANIEL DAVID DENNIS, II, APPELLANT,

v.

EDNA BARBARA MCKINLEY DENNIS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Murray Rubin v. State, 390 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 1980)
  …n, 274 So. 2d 533 (Fla.1973). Even a warrant containing an inaccuracy in the name of a corporate victim is sufficient to commence prosecution and to toll the running of the statute of limitations within the meaning of this statute. State v. Emanuel, 153 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963). An information containing an inaccuracy or imperfection, which is timely filed within the period of limitations, is also sufficient to toll this statute of limitations. State ex rel. Florida Petroleum Marketers Association v. McC…
• State v. Hickman, 189 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
  …imitations, § 932.05, Fla.Stats., F.S.A., a prosecution has been commenced when a warrant has been issued and placed in the hands of a proper officer for execution. Dubbs v. Lehman, 1930, 100 Fla. 799, 130 So. 36, and State v. Emanuel, Fla.App.1963, 153 So. 2d 839.” The law is that a signature may be legally made not only by the signer himself, but by and through someone duly authorized by him. 80 C.J.S. Signatures § 2a, page 1287. In 80 C.J.S. Signatures § 7, page 1292, it is said: - “In the absence of a s…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• State v. Adjmi, 170 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
  …mation) and from statements in the new informations linking them with the first.4 Rouse v. State, 44 Fla. 148, 32 So. 784; Horton v. Mayo, 153 Fla. 611, 15 So. 2d 327; Mead v. State, Fla. 1958, 101 [*343] So. 2d 373; State v. Emanuel, Fla.App. 1963, 153 So. 2d 839. In Mead v. State, supra, the Supreme Court held a subsequent information was so barred because “there was nothing in the last information to link it with the first”. That case and the others cited above stand as authority for the proposition that…

Authorities Cited

• Garfield v. Garfield, 58 So.2d 166 (Fla. 1952)