TARRESSE LEONARD
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 3d DCA | 2023-06-21
No. 23-0023
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The statutes in effect at the time of commission of a crime control both the offenses for which the perpetrator can be convicted and the punishments that may be imposed.


Headnotes

[1] The statutes in effect at the time of commission of a crime, not subsequently enacted statutes, control both the offenses for which a perpetrator can be convicted and the…

[2] Decisional changes in law cannot be characterized as newly discovered facts for purposes of retroactivity analysis under Witt v. …

Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“it is firmly established law that the statutes in effect at the time of commission of a crime control as to the offenses for which the perpetrator can be convicted, as well as the punishments which may be imposed.”

State v. Smith, 547 So. 2d 613, 616 (Fla. 1989)

Facts & Procedural History

Tarresse Leonard appealed from decisions in three criminal cases (F96-8613, F96-8615, and F96-8611) from Miami-Dade County Circuit Court.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Smith, 547 So. 2d 613, 616 (Fla. 1989) (“[I]t is firmly established law that the statutes in effect at the time of commission of a crime control as to the offenses for which the perpetrator can be convicted, as well as the punishments which may be imposed.”); Walton v. State, 246 So. 3d 246, 252 (Fla. 2018) (“Viewing decisional changes in the law as newly discovered ‘facts’ would erase the need for a retroactivity analysis pursuant to [Witt v. State, 387 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 1980)].”).

2


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw