ANTHONY W. MILLER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A court may warn an inmate filing repetitive, frivolous, or abusive habeas petitions that further similar filings may result in sanctions including foreclosure of pro se filing rights and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings.
[1] A court may impose sanctions including foreclosure of pro se filing privileges and referral for prison disciplinary proceedings upon an inmate who files repetitive, frivo…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAnthony W. Miller, an inmate, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Fifth District Court of Appeal relating to Marion County Circuit Court…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
This Court earlier denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus stemming from Marion County Circuit Court Case No. 1996-CF-1495. Since it appears that Petitioner’s filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims arising from or related to Marion County Circuit Court Case No. 1996-CF-1495 may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filings in
2
this Court and referral to prison officials for consideration of disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2021); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999). PETITIONER CAUTIONED.
HARRIS, SOUD and MACIVER, JJ., concur.