KATHRYN L. KUGELMANN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A police officer's testimony that a defendant committed a crime and was the aggressor constitutes improper opinion evidence on guilt and is reversible error under Florida Statutes section 90.403.
[1] A police officer's testimony characterizing the defendant's conduct as criminal conduct and identifying the defendant as the aggressor constitutes inadmissible opinion ev…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[A] witness's opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the accused is not admissible.”
Statement of the general rule, citing Martinez v. State, 761 So. 2d 1074, 1079 (Fla. 2000)
Kathryn Kugelmann was convicted of battery and petit theft after a jury trial in county court. The arresting officer testified that he arrested Kugelm…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Province Of The Jury cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM. Kathryn Kugelmann appeals her conviction and sentence after a jury found her guilty of battery and petit theft. Kugelmann argues the county court erred when it allowed the arresting officer to testify that he arrested her because her actions constituted a battery and that she was the aggressor. On that issue, we agree and reverse.
“[A] witness’s opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the accused is not admissible.” Martinez v. State, 761 So. 2d 1074, 1079 (Fla. 2000). Such testimony is precluded, regardless of its relevance, by section 90.403, Florida Statutes (2022), because “its probative value is substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice to the defendant.” Id. Additionally, the danger of prejudice is heightened when the witness testifying as to the defendant’s guilt is a police officer. Id. at 1080; see also Roundtree v. State, 145 So. 3d 963, 965–67 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (reversible error to admit officer’s statements that largely consisted of officer’s opinion about appellant’s guilt, thereby invading the province of the jury).
2
We therefore reverse and remand for a new trial. We affirm the remaining issues which Kugelmann has raised without comment.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. CIKLIN, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Martinez v. State, 761 So. 2d 1074 (Fla. 2000)
- Roundtree v. State, 145 So. 3d 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)