MARKEY MORRISON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Probation revocation and sentence affirmed; trial court remanded to enter a written order specifying the terms and conditions of probation violated.
[1] In a probation revocation proceeding, the trial court must enter a written order specifying the particular terms and conditions of probation that the defendant was found…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Because the record does not include a written revocation order that identifies the terms and conditions of probation violated, the trial court on remand is instructed to enter a written revocation order that specifies the terms and conditions of probation that Morrison was found to have violated as orally pronounced.”
Court's disposition regarding the deficiency in the trial court's probation revocation order.
Markey Morrison was on probation following a criminal conviction. The trial court revoked Morrison's probation due to violations but did not enter a w…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Written Order Of Revocation cases and more on FLexlaw
August 25, 2023 PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the revocation of probation and the judgment and sentence imposed upon Morrison, as well as
the trial court’s order denying Morrison’s motion to withdraw his plea. Because the record does not include a written revocation order that identifies the terms and conditions of probation violated, the trial court on remand is instructed to enter a written revocation order that specifies the terms and conditions of probation that Morrison was found to have violated as orally pronounced. See Barber v. State, 342 So. 3d 297, 297 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022); Mack v. State, 694 So. 2d 130, 130 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.
MAKAR, EISNAUGLE, and SOUD, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gumersindo Reyes II v. State, 369 So. 3d 779 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024)…case, a written revocation order that identifies the terms and conditions of probation that the trial court, in its oral pronouncement, found Reyes to have violated. See Morrison v. State, 369 So. 3d 779 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023) (citing Barber v. State, 342 So. 3d 297, 297 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)). AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions. MAKAR, JAY, and PRATT, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _________…
-
Markey Morrison v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)…nd conditions of probation violated, the trial court on remand is instructed to enter a written revocation order that specifies the terms and conditions of probation that Morrison was found to have violated as orally pronounced. See Barber v. State, 342 So. 3d 297, 297 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022); Mack v. State, 694 So. 2d 130, 130 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions. MAKAR, EISNAUGLE, and SOUD, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and autho…
-
Gumersindo Reyes II v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2024)…case, a written revocation order that identifies the terms and conditions of probation that the trial court, in its oral pronouncement, found Reyes to have violated. See Morrison v. State, 369 So. 3d 779 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023) (citing Barber v. State, 342 So. 3d 297, 297 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)). AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions. MAKAR, JAY, and PRATT, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. * Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- J.K.H. v. State, 694 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
- Barber v. State, 342 So. 3d 297 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)