SPENCER C. BLANTON
v.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court does not abuse its discretion when ruling on a motion to quash substituted service by accepting conflicting testimony about the served party's actual residence on the date of service.
[1] A trial court does not abuse its discretion when ruling on a motion to quash substituted service by resolving conflicting testimony regarding the served party's actual re…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSpencer C. Blanton appealed a circuit court decision in Monroe County regarding a motion to quash substituted service.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 48.031, Fla. Stat. (2019); Robles-Martinez v. Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP, 88 So. 3d 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that when ruling on a motion to quash substituted service, the trial court, acting as factfinder, did not abuse its discretion when presented with conflicting testimony as to where served party was “actually living” on the date of service); Williams v. Nuno, 239 So. 3d 153, 155 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“[A] trial court's factual determinations, including credibility determinations, are ordinarily not disturbed on appeal.”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Robles-Martinez v. Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP, 88 So. 3d 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
- Williams v. Nuno, 239 So. 3d 153 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)