CODY J. KEY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2023-09-29
No. 23-2444
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

When a trial court's written judgment conflicts with its oral sentencing pronouncement, the oral pronouncement controls; here, the written judgment must be corrected to reflect a life sentence on the first-degree felony count as a Violent Career Criminal, as orally pronounced.


Headnotes

[1] When an oral sentencing pronouncement conflicts with the written judgment and sentence, the oral pronouncement controls and constitutes the legal sentence imposed.

[2] Under Florida Statute section 775.084(4)(d)1, a defendant classified as a Violent Career Criminal convicted of a first-degree felony must receive a mandatory life sentenc…

Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“When there is a conflict between the oral pronouncement and the written sentence, the oral pronouncement controls.”

Court citing Webb v. State, 302 So. 3d 1077, 1079 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) to establish the controlling principle in sentencing conflicts.

Facts & Procedural History

Key was convicted of burglary of a dwelling with damage over $1,000 (count 1, a first-degree felony), burglary of a dwelling (counts 2-3, second-degre…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2444 LT Case No. 2019-CF-008740-A

_____________________________

CODY J. KEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.800 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Mark J. Borello, Judge.

Cody J. Key, Clermont, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

September 29, 2023

KILBANE, J.

Cody J. Key, (“Key”), appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm the trial court on the issues raised by appellant without discussion. However, we reverse and remand, to correct a conflict between the orally pronounced sentence and the written judgment and sentence.

Key was convicted of burglary of a dwelling or structure with damage in excess of $1,000 (count1); burglary of a dwelling (counts 2 and 3); grand theft auto (counts 4 and 5); and trespass in structure or conveyance (count 6).

The State gave notice of intent to classify Key as a Prison Releasee Reoffender, a Habitual Felony Offender, and a Violent Career Criminal (“VCC”). The offense in count1 is a first-degree felony punishable by a sentence up to and including life imprisonment. § 810.02(2)(c)2., Fla. Stat. (2010). As such, when as in this case, the defendant qualifies as a VCC, the required sentence for count1 is life imprisonment. § 775.084(4)(d)1., Fla. Stat.

In its oral sentencing, the trial court correctly applied section 775.084(4)(d)1., and sentenced Key to a life sentence on count1 as a VCC. In its written sentence on count1, the trial court again correctly sentenced Key to life. However, the written judgment and sentence1 reflects Key was sentenced as a VCC on counts 1-3 with 30-year minimum mandatory sentences as to each count. This is incorrect: Section 775.084 does not provide for a 30-year VCC minimum mandatory sentence on a first-degree felony. As a Violent Career Criminal, Key must serve a life sentence on count1 by the terms of section 775.084(4)(d)1. In other words, on count1, the “mandatory minimum” as a VCC is life. The “mandatory minimum” of thirty years as a VCC was correctly applied to counts 2 and 3—but only as to those counts—because they were second- degree felonies. See § 775.084(4)(d)2., Fla. Stat. Because the written judgment and sentence deviated from the oral pronouncement, it resulted in an illegal sentence. See Webb v. State, 302 So. 3d 1077, 1079 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (“When there is a conflict between the oral pronouncement and the written sentence, the oral pronouncement controls.”); Rodriguez v. State, 223 So. 3d 1053, 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (“[T]he oral pronouncement controls and constitutes the legal sentence imposed.” (alteration in original) (quoting Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600, 603 (Fla. 2007))).

Accordingly, the trial court’s denial of Key’s motion is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the cause is remanded with instructions to correct the written judgment and sentence to reflect a VCC life sentence on count1, as orally pronounced by the trial court and in accordance with section 775.084(4)(d)1.

AFFIRMED in PART; REVERSED and REMANDED in PART.

EDWARDS, C.J., and BOATWRIGHT, J., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________

Footnotes
1 At page 9, “Special Provisions.”

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw