ADEENA WEISS, ETC.
v.
CAROLINE WEISS

Fla. 3d DCA | 2023-10-11
No. 2022-2136
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2023) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Transfer of stock in a closely held corporation requires documentary evidence sufficient under applicable statutory provisions, and extrinsic evidence of intent alone is insufficient absent such documentation.


Headnotes

[1] Transfer of stock in a closely held corporation requires compliance with statutory documentary requirements; extrinsic evidence of the parties' intent to transfer stock i…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“even if extrinsic evidence exists which might show that the Shahids intended Mrs. Shahid to possess a shareholder interest in Shoreline, because Mr. Shahid controlled the ability of Shoreline to issue shares of stock or transfer shares on its stock register, in the absence of any documentary evidence sufficient under chapter 678, the record evidence here is insufficient as a matter of law to establish transfer”

Citation to Sackett v. Shahid explaining the inadequacy of extrinsic evidence without documentary support for stock transfer

Facts & Procedural History

Adeena Weiss appealed a circuit court judgment concerning the transfer of stock in a closely held corporation. The trial court made factual findings r…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 29, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-2136 Lower Tribunal No. 14-30864

________________

Adeena Weiss, etc., et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Caroline Weiss, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Migna Sanchez-Llorens, Judge. Torricella Law, PLLC, and Maurice J. Baumgarten; Joel S. Perwin, P.A., and Joel S. Perwin, for appellants. Schlesinger Law Group, and Michael J. Schlesinger; Law Offices of Geoffrey B. Marks, and Geoffrey B. Marks, for appellees. Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fito v. Att’y’s Title Ins. Fund, Inc., 83 So. 3d 755, 757 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (“A factual finding made by a trial court in a non-jury trial is clearly erroneous only when there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, it is clearly against the weight of the evidence or it was induced by an erroneous view of the law.”); Sackett v. Shahid, 722 So. 2d 273, 276 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (explaining UCC and common law standard for transfer of stock of a closely held corporation and holding that “even if extrinsic evidence exists which might show that the Shahids intended Mrs. Shahid to possess a shareholder interest in Shoreline, because Mr. Shahid controlled the ability of Shoreline to issue shares of stock or transfer shares on its stock register, in the absence of any documentary evidence sufficient under chapter 678, the record evidence here is insufficient as a matter of law to establish transfer of the Shoreline stock to the Shahids as tenants by the entireties”); Guthartz v. Park Ctr. W. Corp, 409 F. App’x 248, 250 (11th Cir. 2010) (citing Sackett and explaining that: “Such requirements exist to prevent situations exactly like the one at bar: he said/she said lawsuits where one party asserts that a transfer was made based on some document not reflected in the corporate records. These requirements apply with equal force to gifts.”).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Adeena Weiss v. BI 27, LLC (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)
    …ts origin to the death of Weiss-Ortiz’s father, Jack Weiss, a prominent attorney. The parties are not strangers to the court. See Ortiz v. Weiss, 227 So. 3d 689 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017); Ortiz v. Weiss, 282 So. 3d 949 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); Weiss v. Weiss, 317 So. 3d 167 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021). Weiss-Ortiz filed suit in the instant case against her mother, Caroline Weiss, along with the Estate of Jack Weiss and Towers of Blue Lagoon (1), seeking to quiet title to three parcels of real property located near the Miami 1…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw