DAYTONA BEACH RACING AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES DISTRICT ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
C. S. PAUL, TAX COLLECTOR FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. | 1963-06-26
No. 31875
TERRELL, THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur., ROBERTS, C. J., dissents.
154 So. 2d 832 Florida Supreme Court (1963)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court determined that it had improvidently invoked appellate jurisdiction in this case and that the District Court of Appeal, First District, had proper jurisdiction. The case was ordered to be transferred to the appropriate appellate court.


Holding

The Florida Supreme Court held that it did not have appellate jurisdiction and that the District Court of Appeal, First District, was the proper venue for the appeal.


Key Quotes

“Upon further consideration of this matter subsequent to oral argument before this Court on jurisdiction and merits a majority of the Court are of the view that our appellate jurisdiction has been improvidently invoked and that jurisdiction for the determination of the merits of this cause is vested in the District Court of Appeal, First District.”

Establishes the court's reasoning for transferring the case.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The appellants filed a notice of appeal and other papers with the Florida Supreme Court. Following oral argument, a majority of the Court concluded th…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon further consideration of this matter subsequent to oral argument before this Court on jurisdiction and merits a majority of the Court are of the view that our appellate jurisdiction has been improvidently invoked and that jurisdiction for the determination of the merits of this cause is vested in the District Court of Appeal, First District. It is thereupon

Ordered that the notice of appeal and other papers herein be forthwith transferred by the Clerk of this Court to the Clerk of the District Court of Appeal, First District. The notice of appeal and other papers filed herein shall have the same force and effect as if filed in the District Court of Appeal, First District, and as of the time when filed in this Court.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, C. J., dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw