S. B.
v.
DEPT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

Fla. 2d DCA | 2023-11-29
No. 23-1261
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A petition for writ of certiorari in this child dependency matter was denied.


Headnotes

[1] An appellate court may exercise its discretion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c) to treat an appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and summarily de…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

S.B. appealed a circuit court decision in a dependency case involving three children (A.P., E.B., and L.B.). The Department of Children and Families a…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Bruce Bartlett, State Attorney, Sixth Judicial Circuit of Florida, and Leslie M. Layne, Assistant State Attorney, Clearwater, for Appellee Department of Children and Families.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, Tallahassee, and Stephanie E. Novenario, Senior Appellate Attorney, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

We treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(c), and deny the petition.

2

Denied.

KHOUZAM, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw