MARK ANTHONY HAUSER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2023-11-29
No. 2022-2787
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A challenge to the voluntary nature of a guilty plea based on alleged trial counsel ineffectiveness is not preserved for appellate review without a motion to withdraw the plea, and no fundamental-error exception applies.


Headnotes

[1] A challenge to the involuntariness of a guilty plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel must be preserved by filing a motion to withdraw the plea under Florida Rul…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“there is no fundamental-error exception to the preservation requirement of rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)”

Citation to State v. Dortch explaining the strict application of the preservation rule for involuntary plea claims

Facts & Procedural History

Hauser entered a guilty plea pursuant to a plea agreement with the State in Dixie County Circuit Court. He appealed, arguing trial counsel rendered in…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

November 29, 2023 PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals a judgment and sentence following a guilty plea entered pursuant to a plea agreement with the State. He argues trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance, so his entered plea was involuntary. But Appellant did not file a motion to withdraw plea. Accordingly, this issue is not preserved for appeal. See State v. Dortch 317 So. 3d 1074, 1084 (Fla. 2021) (holding that for appeals based on alleged incompetency at the guilty plea, “there is no fundamental-error exception to the preservation requirement of rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c)”); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c) (allowing appeal from “involuntary plea, if preserved by a motion to withdraw plea” (emphasis added)).

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and KELSEY and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

2

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw