SUZANNE EILEEN ANDERSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment and sentence are affirmed, but the case is remanded for the trial court to correct scrivener's errors in the written judgment and probation order to reflect the no contest plea that was actually entered.
[1] In an Anders appeal, where the appellate court determines the judgment and sentence are proper, it may remand only for correction of scrivener's errors in the written jud…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAnderson appealed her conviction from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. The trial court imposed a judgment and sentence, but the written judgment…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders* appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court but remand for the trial court to correct the written judgment and the written order of probation to reflect that Anderson entered a plea of no contest rather than a plea of guilty. See Davis v. State, 211 So. 3d 354, 354 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (“We remand only for correction of a scrivener’s error in judgment” in an Anders case.).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.
EDWARDS, C.J., and MAKAR and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Davis v. State, 211 So. 3d 354 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)