NATHANIEL STEPHENSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A habeas corpus petition that appears to be abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous may be dismissed, and the petitioner may be warned of potential sanctions for future similar filings.
[1] A court may dismiss a habeas corpus petition as abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous and warn a pro se petitioner of sanctions, including potential bar from pro s…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceNathaniel Stephenson, an incarcerated prisoner, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus related to Marion County Circuit Court Case No. 2017-CF-430…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pro Se Litigant Sanctions cases and more on FLexlaw
December 21, 2023 PER CURIAM.
This Court previously affirmed Petitioner’s direct appeal and thereafter, dismissed several petitions and appeals filed in this Court stemming from Marion County Circuit Court Case No. 2017-CF-4308. Because it appears that Petitioner’s filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from the identified case number may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filings in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2023); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999). Moreover, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed November 16, 2023, is dismissed. See Richardson v. State, 918 So. 2d 999, 1002–03 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
PETITIONER WARNED; PETITION DISMISSED. JAY, HARRIS, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Richardson v. State, 918 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)