MIAMI TRANSIT COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
WALTER M. FORD AND MABEL FORD, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1963-07-24
No. 62-460
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
155 So. 2d 363 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1963)
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida District Court of Appeal vacated its prior dismissal of an appeal and reinstated it for a decision on the merits, following a mandate from the Florida Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had quashed the dismissal, directing the appellate court to proceed with the case.


Holding

Yes, the District Court of Appeal must vacate its prior dismissal and reinstate the appeal for a determination on the merits, as directed by the Supreme Court of Florida.


Key Quotes

“Whereas, on review of this courts' judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed June 19, 1963 (155 So. 2d 360) and mandate dated July 18, 1963, now lodged in this court, quashed this courts' judgment of dismissal and remanded the cause to this court for further proceedings consistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida;”

This quote establishes the Supreme Court's action in quashing the dismissal and remanding the case, which is the basis for the current order.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Miami Transit Company appealed a decision from the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court. This court initially dismissed the appeal on January 29, 1963.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mandate cases and more on FLexlaw


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

*364PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on January 29, 1963 (Fla.App., 149 So.2d 87) dismissing this appeal from the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida in and for Dade County, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this courts’ judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed June 19, 1963 (155 So.2d 360) and mandate dated July 18, 1963, now lodged in this court, quashed this courts’ judgment of dismissal and remanded the cause to this court for further proceedings consistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida;

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the judgment of this court filed January 29, 1963, is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the above styled appeal is reinstated and shall proceed to a final determination on the merits.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw