PAVEL MARTINEZ-RUIZ
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 3d DCA | 2024-02-28
No. 2023-1178
2024 FL 2110 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

An appellate court lacks jurisdiction to hear a challenge to plea validity when the defendant failed to file a motion to withdraw the plea in the trial court.


Headnotes

[1] Preservation of issues related to plea validity requires filing a motion to withdraw the plea in the trial court, and this requirement is not subject to fundamental error…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“We hold that there is no fundamental-error exception to the preservation requirement of rule 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c).”

State v. Dorch, cited to establish that appellants cannot bypass jurisdictional requirements through fundamental error doctrine

Facts & Procedural History

Pavel Martinez-Ruiz appealed from a Circuit Court decision in Monroe County, challenging the validity of his plea without having filed a motion to wit…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Because Appellant failed to file a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court, this Court is without jurisdiction to hear the instant appeal. See State v. Dorch, 317 So. 3d 1074, 1084 (Fla. 2021) (“We hold that there is no fundamental-error exception to the preservation requirement of rule

9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c).”); Hicks v. State, 915 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (holding that the District Court did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim that plea was not voluntary and intelligent where the defendant failed to file a motion to withdraw the plea in trial court). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice so that Appellant can properly seek to withdraw his plea in the trial court.

Dismissed without prejudice.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw