5350 PARK, LLC, ETC.
v.
GRYCON, LLC, ETC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A ruling supported by competent substantial evidence is upheld on appeal even if contrary evidence exists, and failure to object at trial waives appellate review of evidentiary issues.
[1] Failure to raise an objection to witness testimony at trial waives the objection on appeal.
[2] An objection challenging the sufficiency of evidence must be raised at trial to be preserved for appellate review.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThis is an appeal from a circuit court judgment in Miami-Dade County involving 5350 Park, LLC and Grycon LLC regarding a dispute that proceeded to sum…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Law Of The Case Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. Mining & Materials v. Mobley, 649 So. 2d 934, 934 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (“[C]ase[s] may not be retried on appeal, and a ruling which is supported by competent substantial evidence will be upheld even though there may be some persuasive evidence to the contrary.”); Vermeulen v. Worldwide Holidays, Inc., 922 So. 2d 271, 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“Mere speculation or inference of negligence is insufficient to defeat summary judgment.”); Ramsey v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 124 So. 3d 415, 418 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (“Conclusory, general assertions do not create factual disputes necessary to avoid summary judgment.”); McCoy v. Hollywood Quarries, Inc., 544 So. 2d 274, 276 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (holding that order which was not appealed was law of the case and prohibited litigant from arguing matters to the contrary in subsequent appeal); Polaco v. Smith, 376 So. 2d 409, 409 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979) (explaining that failure to object to witness testimony at trial waives the objection); State v. Hampton, 44 So. 3d 661, 664-65 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (requiring that an objection challenging the sufficiency of the evidence must be raised at trial in order to preserve it for appellate review).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Fla. Mining & Materials v. Mobley, 649 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
- Ramsey v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 124 So. 3d 415 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)
- Klaas Vermeulen v. Worldwide Holidays, Inc., 922 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
- Polaco v. Smith, 376 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
- McCOY v. Hollywood Quarries, Inc., 544 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
- State v. Hampton, 44 So. 3d 661 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)