D. P.
v.
DEPT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court dismissed the appeal by treating it as a petition for writ of certiorari.
D.P. is the father in a dependency proceeding involving children B.P. and M.P. He appealed from a circuit court order denying his motion for reunifica…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Parental Rights cases and more on FLexlaw
Bruce Bartlett, State Attorney of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, and Leslie M. Layne, Assistant State Attorney, Clearwater, for Appellant Department of Children and Families.
Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Amanda Victoria Glass, Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, for Appellant Guardian ad Litem Program.
PER CURIAM.
D.P., the father in this dependency proceeding, appeals from the order denying his motion for reunification. We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, see D.P. v. Dep't of Child. & Fams., 367 So. 3d 595, 597 (Fla. 2d DCA 2023), and dismiss.
Petition dismissed.
LaROSE, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
2