QUARTERMAN

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Cleveland v. City OF Miami, 263 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 1972)
  …111 So. 2d 472 (3rd D.C.A.Fla.1959); Bartholf v. Baker, 71 So. 2d 480 (Fla.1954); City of Jacksonville Beach v. Jones, 101 Fla. [95] 96, 133 So. 562 (1931). Compare Crosier v. Joseph Abraham Ford Co., 150 So. 2d 499 (3rd D.C.A.Fla.1963), cert. den. 155 So. 2d 693 [Fla.].” (Emphasis supplied.) The testimony does not show that Cleveland “willingly exposed himself” to the gunfire. He was on the balcony of his home with his family watching a gathering of policemen. They did not expect to be fired upon. Responde…
• Kenyon v. Kenyon, 496 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
  …rmanency of “today’s marriages.” The separation agreement entered into by the parties and ratified by the trial court is a contract and should be construed and interpreted as such. Brenske v. Brenske, 151 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963), cert. denied, 155 So. 2d 693 (Fla.1963). A standard of contract interpretation is to give the contract terms their plain meaning absent evidence of the parties’ intent to give those terms a special meaning. Mulhern v. Mulhern, 446 So. 2d 1124, 1126 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). There is…
• City OF Milton v. Broxson, 514 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
  …e reasonable care to warn him of a defect or condition known by it to be dangerous if such danger was not open to ordinary observation by him. Byers v. Gunn, 81 So. 2d 723 (Fla.1955); Crutchfield v. Adams, 152 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied 155 So. 2d 693 (Fla.1963). The record shows that there was no intention to willfully or wantonly harm the plaintiff, nor was there any failure to warn him of a defect or condition known by the City to be dangerous but not open to ordinary observation. The City’s m…