PUBLIC COUNSEL EX REL. CITIZENS OF FLORIDA
v.
FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND PLURIS WEDGEFIELD, LLC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Public Counsel petitioned for judicial review of a Florida Public Service Commission ratemaking decision, seeking direct appellate review under section 350.128, Florida Statutes. The court dismissed the petition after Public Counsel filed a notice of voluntary dismissal.
The court dismissed the petition as moot after Public Counsel filed a notice of voluntary dismissal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.350(b).
[1] The Florida Public Service Commission's quasi-legislative ratemaking functions are not subject to the Administrative Procedure Act.
[2] Judicial review of the Florida Public Service Commission's ratemaking actions is governed by section 350.128, Florida Statutes.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The Florida Public Service Commission has been and shall continue to be an arm of the legislative branch of government.”
Establishes the constitutional status of the PSC as a legislative body, explaining why ratemaking is a quasi-legislative function exempt from APA requirements.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePublic Counsel challenged interim ratemaking action by the Florida Public Service Commission involving Pluris Wedgefield, LLC. The petition was initia…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Direct Review Of Administrative Action cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-0225 _____________________________
PUBLIC COUNSEL,
Petitioner,
v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and PLURIS WEDGEFIELD, LLC,
Respondents.
_____________________________
Petition for Review of Action of the Florida Public Service Commission—Original Jurisdiction.
March 27, 2024 TANENBAUM, J.
The public counsel seeks judicial review of ratemaking action of the Florida Public Service Commission. See § 350.128(1), Fla. Stat. (“The District Court of Appeal, First District, shall, upon petition, review any other action of the commission.”); see also Art. V, § 4(b)(2), Fla. Const. (“District courts of appeal shall have the power of direct review of administrative action, as prescribed by general law.”). It was filed as a petition for review of non-final agency action under section 120.68(1)(a), Florida Statutes, but the Administrative Procedure Act does not apply to quasi-legislative functions like the interim ratemaking being challenged here. Cf. § 350.001, Fla. Stat. (“The Florida Public Service Commission has been and shall continue to be an arm of the legislative branch of government.”); § 120.50(1), Fla. Stat. (excepting the Legislature and judiciary from application of chapter 120); § 120.52(1), Fla. Stat. (defining “agency” in terms that do not expressly include the Florida Public Service Commission); § 120.52(7), Fla. Stat. (defining “final order” as “a written final decision which results from a proceeding under s. 120.56, s. 120.565, s. 120.569, s. 120.57, s. 120.573, or s. 120.574,” including “final agency actions which are affirmative, negative, injunctive, or declaratory in form”—but not a decision on ratemaking resulting from a proceeding under chapters 350 through 368); § 120.68(1), Fla. Stat. (addressing “judicial review” in terms of “final agency action” and interim orders leading to final agency action); § 120.80(13), Fla. Stat. (specifying exceptions and exemptions for the Florida Public Service Commission).* We in turn treat the petition as one seeking review of action of the Florida Public Service Commission under section 350.128, Florida Statutes.
That stated, the public counsel now has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.350(b). The petition, in turn, is dismissed. The court denies as moot the motion to hold this case in abeyance.
DISMISSED.
LEWIS and B.L. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________
Walt L Trierweiler, Charles John Rehwinkel, and Octavio Paulus Simoes-Ponce, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.
* We suggest that the Appellate Court Rules Committee consider revisions to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.020, 9.100, 9.110, and 9.190 to address the unique nature of judicial review of ratemaking action.
Michael G. Cooke, Tampa; Keith Hetrick, Daniel Joseph McNeal Dose, Jennifer Susan Crawford, Samantha M Cibula, Douglas Derek Sunshine, and David Clifford Ashburn, Tallahassee; Martin Scott Friedman, Orlando, for Respondents.