USRY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The First District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in a case involving Darrell Usry and the State of Florida. The court's per curiam opinion provided no detailed reasoning, simply stating the affirmation.
The court affirmed the lower court's decision without providing specific grounds.
“AFFIRMED.”
This is the entirety of the court's substantive ruling.
The provided text is a per curiam affirmance with no factual background presented. It indicates that Darrell Usry is the appellant and the State of Fl…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pro Se Litigant Restrictions cases and more on FLexlaw
B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- In re McDONALD, 489 U.S. 180 (U.S. 1989)
- Pettway v. McNEIL, 987 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2008)
- Percival Charles Ferris, Jr. v. State, 100 So. 3d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
- Callard v. Braulio L. Baez, 934 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 2006)