THADDEUS J. GREZIK, APPELLANT,

v.

BETTY JEAN GREZIK, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Finn v. Finn, 312 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1975)
  …trict Court of Appeal, Third District, in Finn v. Finn, Fla.App. (3rd), 1974, 294 So. 2d 57. It is asserted that this decision is in direct conflict with Perla v. Perla, Sup.Ct.Fla.1952, 58 So. 2d 689 and with Fincham v. Levin, Fla.App. (1st), 1963, 155 So. 2d 883. We also note a conflict with White v. White, Fla.App. (1st) 1974, 296 So. 2d 619, which was decided after the Finn case on review here. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. In the case sub judice the c…
• Houston R. White v. White, 296 So. 2d 619 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
  …2d 157, that court, citing Perla v. Perla, supra, restated the proposition that a mother’s right to receive support money “would automatically terminate upon the son’s attaining his majority.” This Court, in Fincham v. Levin, Fla. App. (1st) 1963, 155 So. 2d 883, held that a divorced father .may be required to contribute to the support of his unmarried adult daughter who was congenatively mentally and physically unable to care for and support herself, saying however: “ * * * He [appellant] cites the annota…
• Kern v. Kern, 360 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
  …lude the obligation to nurture, support, educate and protect the child.2 As a general rule, the legal duty of a parent to support his children ceases at the age of majority. Winikoff v. Winikoff, 339 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Fincham v. Levin, 155 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963); Perla v. Perla, supra. Of course, one exception to the general rule imposes a continuing duty on a parent to care for an adult child suffering from physical or mental deficiencies. Perla v. Perla, supra. Annot., Parent’s Obligat…