PERNELL R. ROBERTS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2024-07-17
No. 2022-0689
2024 FL 8646 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Pernell Roberts appealed his conviction on four issues, with the court finding merit in only one. The court reversed the imposition of a twenty-five-year mandatory minimum sentence for Count 1 because Roberts was not charged with or found to have actual possession or discharge of the firearm, and vicarious liability cannot substitute for this sentencing requirement.


Holding

A defendant cannot be sentenced to a mandatory minimum for actual possession or discharge of a firearm based on vicarious liability when the defendant was not charged with that offense and there was no jury finding of actual possession or discharge by the defendant. The court reversed the twenty-five-year mandatory minimum sentence for Count 1 and remanded for the trial court to delete the sentence and references to section 775.087.


Headnotes

[1] A mandatory minimum sentence for firearm possession or discharge requires a specific finding of actual possession or discharge by the defendant, not vicarious liability.

[2] A jury's verdict must contain a specific finding of actual firearm possession or discharge to support a mandatory minimum sentence for that offense.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Vicarious liability will not substitute for actual possession or discharge of the firearm for this sentencing requirement.”

Establishes the core legal principle that mandatory minimum sentencing for firearm possession/discharge cannot be imposed based on vicarious liability.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Roberts was convicted on multiple counts. For Count 1, the trial court imposed a twenty-five-year mandatory minimum sentence based on actual possessio…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Daniel Arthur Casey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 20006268CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Elizabeth Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pablo Tapia, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM.

The defendant raises four issues on appeal. We find merit in only one; as to the other three, we affirm without discussion. As to the meritorious issue, the State has appropriately conceded error.

The defendant’s sentence on Count 1 included a twenty-five-year mandatory minimum term of imprisonment for actual possession or discharge of a firearm. However, he was not charged with actual possession or discharge of the firearm, and the jury did not make a specific finding in this regard. Additionally, the judgments for Counts 1 and 3 incorrectly contain references to section 775.087, Florida Statutes (2020).

Vicarious liability will not substitute for actual possession or discharge of the firearm for this sentencing requirement. Squire v. State, 278 So. 3d 153, 156 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). Here, there was no allegation, evidence, or jury finding of actual possession or discharge of the firearm by the defendant. Rather, through the allegations, evidence, and jury findings, there is no question the accomplice was the party who had actual

2

possession of, and discharged, the firearm.

We, therefore, reverse the imposition of the twenty-five-year mandatory minimum sentence for Count 1. As with Squire, a resentencing hearing is not required. We remand with instructions to the trial court to ministerially amend (1) the judgment as to Counts 1 and 3 to delete the references to section 775.087, Florida Statutes (2020), and (2) the written sentence entered for Count 1 to delete the twenty-five-year mandatory minimum sentence.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions. CIKLIN, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw