WILLIAMS, ESTATE OF DOMINIQUE ALEXANDRIA BULLARD
v.
AREA HOUSING COMMISSION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted defendants' motion to redact the performance fee paid to a third-party performer from an artist agreement submitted in support of a motion to dismiss, finding the redaction sufficiently narrowly tailored and the confidential business information of non-parties a legitimate basis to overcome the presumption of public access to judicial documents.
[1] A court may seal or redact portions of judicial documents when the party seeking sealing demonstrates that legitimate countervailing factors, such as protection of confid…
[2] Pricing information and performance fees in commercial contracts may be legitimately redacted from judicial documents when the information is treated as confidential by t…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDefendants in a civil action submitted an artist agreement (Exhibit D to the Dowe Declaration) between We Cousinz, LLC and DJ Envy LLC as support for …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Finality Of Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2024-1021 _____________________________ KATRINA L. WILLIAMS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Dominique Alexandria Bullard,
Appellant,
v. AREA HOUSING COMMISSION, Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Jennifer J. Frydrychowicz, Judge. September 18, 2024 PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Hoffman v. Hall, 817 So. 2d 1057, 1058 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (“An order which merely grants a motion to dismiss but does not actually enter a final judgment is nonfinal and nonappealable”). LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________
Jonathan A. Martin and John S. Mills of Bishop Page & Mills, PLLC, Jacksonville; Linje Rivers and Kamaria H. Williams, Ponte Vedra, for Appellant. No appearance for Appellee.