C. E. HIGHTOWER, PETITIONER,
v.
WILLIAM F. BIGONEY, JR., RESPONDENT
C. E. HIGHTOWER, PETITIONER,
WILLIAM F. BIGONEY, JR., RESPONDENT
156 So. 2d 509
Florida Supreme Court (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
The records and briefs in this cause have been examined. The questions raised herein are the same as those raised in the companion case of Hightower v. Bigoney, Fla., 156 So.2d 501, which was consolidated with this case for purposes of review, one of said cases having been by appeal and other review by certiorari. The matter having *510been disposed of by appeal, it becomes unnecessary for us to exercise jurisdiction of this cause on certiorari. Accordingly, petition for writ of certiorari heretofore issued is hereby quashed.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wincast Assocs., Inc. v. Hickey, 342 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 1977)…t tends to agitate the butterflies in the stomach of an old common law lawyer who imbibed the common law from Coke, Blackstone, Holdworth’s History of English Law, Lord Campbell’s Lives of the Chief Justices, and Mr. Justice Holmes’ The Common Law.” 156 So. 2d 509. See also Olin’s, Inc. v. Avis Rental Car Sys., 131 So. 2d 20 (Fla.3d DCA 1961). We believe that the Hightower holding should be extended to the facts of the instant ease. It is desirable policy to encourage the filing of cross-claims and permissi…
Authorities Cited
- Hightower v. Bigoney, 156 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 1963)