WAINWRIGHT
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2024-10-16
No. 1D2024-0660
Chief Judge James F. McKay; III; Judge Daniel L. Dysart; Judge Paula A. Brown
2024 FL 11996 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Joseph Barney Wainwright, Jr. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the Florida District Court of Appeal. The court denied the petition because the circuit court directed a response to the motion pending below.


Holding

The court denied the petition for writ of mandamus because the circuit court directed a response to the motion pending below.


Headnotes

[1] A petition for writ of mandamus is improper when the circuit court has already directed a response to the motion at issue, as mandamus is available only when no other ade…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“As the circuit court directed a response to the motion pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus.”

The court's basis for denying the mandamus petition, indicating that the circuit court's direction to respond to the pending motion meant mandamus was not appropriate.

Facts & Procedural History

Joseph Barney Wainwright, Jr. sought a writ of mandamus against the State of Florida. The motion was pending before the circuit court, which directed …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

October 16, 2024 PER CURIAM.

As the circuit court directed a response to the motion pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). ROBERTS, KELSEY, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________ Joseph Barney Wainwright, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw